Review methodology
How We Review Casinos
How we evaluate sources, distinguish documented terms from tests, handle corrections and disclose future commercial relationships.
Regulatory evidence
We compare casino terms, currencies, payment routes, identity requirements and geographic restrictions. Each factual claim needs a relevant source and a review date. Operator-stated licensing and a regulator-confirmed registry entry are labelled as different evidence.
Service claims and testing
A terms document can establish what a company says, not how a real transaction performed. Document profiles are identified as such. We do not claim deposit, withdrawal, app or KYC tests without a recorded test. Unknown fees and timings are not replaced by industry averages.
Game mathematics
Game calculations state their assumptions: pocket counts and payout conventions for roulette, and the relevant long-run model for RTP. The examples explain risk; they are not session forecasts.
Corrections and translations
A correction should identify the page, disputed statement and relevant source. Confirmed corrections should be applied to both languages and their source records. Correction requests should identify the article and source. Do not send identity documents, passwords or payment records to an editorial channel.
Commercial independence
Brand order is editorial rather than a score. Commercial links require approval and disclosure, with sponsored attribution. A citation or a commercial agreement is not evidence of local authorization or an independent test.
Independent editorial information. No gaming service, deposits or real-money play.